The Most Expensive Chinese Porcelain Ever Sold at Auction

The highest prices Chinese porcelain has made at auction: the 2017 Ru brush washer, the Chenghua chicken cup, the Qianlong vases, and what those numbers really mean.

The object that holds the auction record for Chinese ceramics is a shallow dish thirteen centimetres across, glazed a pale blue-grey, with no decoration on it whatsoever. It was made for the Northern Song court somewhere around the turn of the twelfth century, it was used for washing brushes, and in October 2017 it sold in Hong Kong for the equivalent of about thirty-eight million US dollars.

That gap — between what the object looks like and what it costs — is the whole subject. This is a list of the highest prices Chinese porcelain has made at auction, but it is more useful as a guide to what those prices are actually paying for, and to the difference between a headline figure and money that changes hands.

The record: a Ru guanyao brush washer, Sotheby's Hong Kong, 2017

On 3 October 2017 a Ru guanyao brush washer of the Northern Song dynasty sold at Sotheby's Hong Kong for HK$294.3 million, around US$37.7 million, after roughly twenty minutes of bidding. It came from the Le Cong Tang collection and had earlier been in the Chang Foundation's holdings at the Hongxi Museum in Taipei.

Nothing about it is showy. Ru ware is monochrome, undecorated, and quiet to the point of austerity. What it has instead is scarcity of an almost absurd order: Ru was made for the imperial court over a very short window — a couple of decades at most — and the surviving corpus is tiny, with the overwhelming majority in museums. Only a handful remain in private hands, which means that in practice a collector may get one chance in a lifetime to buy one, or none.

That is the first lesson of this list. At the very top, price tracks availability far more than it tracks visual complexity. Ru ware and the imperial Song kilns is worth understanding on its own terms before the number makes any sense.

The Chenghua chicken cup, Sotheby's Hong Kong, 2014

The record the Ru washer broke was held by an object even smaller: a Chenghua-period doucai wine cup about eight centimetres across, painted with a rooster, a hen and their chicks. It sold at Sotheby's Hong Kong on 8 April 2014 for HK$281.24 million, roughly US$36.05 million, to the Shanghai collector Liu Yiqian, and came from the celebrated Meiyintang collection.

Chicken cups are the most storied objects in Chinese ceramics. They were already being collected and copied within a century or two of their making, imperial kilns reproduced them under later reigns, and only around sixteen are thought to survive from the Chenghua period. The doucai technique — underglaze blue outlines filled with overglaze enamels after the first firing — is what gives them their particular softness of colour, and it is also what makes them difficult to fake at the level that matters. The Chenghua marks and doucai wares are a study in themselves, not least because so many later pieces carry Chenghua marks in homage rather than deception.

The rest of the top tier

Below those two, the highest recorded prices cluster around imperial Qing enamelled wares and a second Ru piece.

| Object | Sale | Price ||---|---|---|| Ru guanyao brush washer, Northern Song | Sotheby's Hong Kong, October 2017 | HK$294.3m (c. US$37.7m) || Chenghua doucai chicken cup | Sotheby's Hong Kong, April 2014 | HK$281.24m (c. US$36.05m) || Qianlong yellow-ground yangcai double-gourd vase | Sotheby's Hong Kong, October 2010 | HK$252.66m (c. US$32m) || Ru guanyao lobed brush washer, Northern Song | Sotheby's Hong Kong, April 2012 | HK$207.86m (c. US$26.8m) || Qianlong doucai and famille-rose 'Anbaxian' vase | Christie's Hong Kong, May 2018 | HK$130.6m |

Two patterns are visible immediately. Every one of these sales happened in Hong Kong, which has been the centre of the high-end Chinese ceramics market for a generation. And the Qing entries are all imperial enamelled wares from the Qianlong reign — technically the most demanding porcelain ever made in China, produced in small numbers under direct court supervision. If you want to understand what the buyers of those lots were paying for, the famille rose enamel technique is the background.

A note on what is not in the table: a Qianlong falangcai pouch-shaped vase sold at Sotheby's Hong Kong for around HK$207 million, a figure that would place it in this company. It is glass, not porcelain. The imperial workshops enamelled both, in the same palette and often to the same designs, and the two get conflated in price lists constantly.

The record that wasn't: the Pinner vase

The most instructive sale on this subject is one that failed.

In November 2010 a reticulated yangcai vase of the Qianlong period, found while clearing a house in Pinner, north-west London, was offered at Bainbridge's, a suburban auction house. It hammered at £43 million — with premium, about £53.1 million — and was reported worldwide as the most expensive Chinese work of art ever sold.

The buyer did not pay. After a stalemate lasting roughly two years, reportedly involving a dispute over the buyer's premium, the vase was sold privately through Bonhams to a different buyer, at a figure widely reported as somewhere in the region of £20–25 million. Less than half the headline.

Keep that case in mind whenever you read a record price. A hammer price is the moment a bidding contest stops; it is not a receipt. Sales collapse, buyers default, guarantees and irrevocable bids shape the number before the room ever sees it, and the reported figure may include a buyer's premium of twenty per cent or more that never appears in the casual retelling. Anyone bidding seriously should understand how buying at auction actually works before treating published records as market fact.

What these prices do and don't tell a collector

It is tempting to read a list like this as a map of value. It is not. These are the extreme outliers of a market whose ordinary transactions happen three, four and five orders of magnitude lower, and the factors that produce a thirty-million-dollar result — imperial commission, single-digit survival numbers, unbroken documented provenance, museum publication — are absent from essentially everything a private collector will ever be offered.

What the list does teach is which variables the top of the market rewards, and those do scale downward:

Rarity beats decoration. The plainest object on the list is the most expensive one.
Imperial association is the single largest multiplier, which is why reign marks are studied so intensely and faked so persistently. The master guide to Chinese porcelain marks is the place to start on that, and it will also tell you why a Chenghua mark on a piece is more often homage than fraud.
Provenance carries real money. Le Cong Tang and Meiyintang are not decorative details in those two lot descriptions; a documented chain of distinguished ownership is part of what was purchased.
Condition is close to absolute at this level. Restoration that would be tolerable on a mid-market piece removes an object from this conversation entirely.

If you are trying to work out what something in front of you is worth rather than what a record-holder made, the process is a different one — see how Chinese art is actually valued and appraised.

Common questions

Is the 2017 Ru brush washer still the record holder?

It set the world auction record for Chinese ceramics when it sold in October 2017, breaking the 2014 chicken cup. Records at this level move rarely, because the material that could break them almost never comes to market — but any list of this kind is a snapshot, and the honest way to read the figures here is as prices achieved on the dates given, converted at the rates of the day, rather than as a standing league table.

Why is Song ceramic worth more than elaborately decorated Qing porcelain?

Partly scarcity, partly taste. Ru survives in tiny numbers, which sets a hard ceiling on supply. But there is also a long-standing hierarchy in Chinese connoisseurship that places Song monochromes — valued for glaze, form and restraint — above later decorated wares, and that judgement has been held by scholars and collectors for centuries. The market has increasingly come round to it.

Do these prices include the buyer's premium?

The figures quoted here are the reported totals including premium, which is the convention in auction reporting. It is worth checking, because the difference is substantial: premiums at the major houses run to roughly a quarter of the hammer price at lower levels, tapering on very large lots. A hammer price and a "sold for" figure are different numbers, and press coverage moves between them without warning.

Could something like this turn up in an ordinary house?

The Pinner vase did, which is why the story travelled so far. It is also why the story is misleading. For every genuine attic discovery there are vast quantities of later copies, export wares and twentieth-century reproductions carrying earlier reign marks, most of them made without any intent to deceive. The base rate is unforgiving, and the correct response to a promising piece is a specialist opinion rather than a plane ticket.

Browse the collection

Porcelain is a subject we write about rather than one we stock. What Kiln & Ink sells is paper: limited-edition archival giclée reproductions of the twentieth-century Chinese ink masters, printed on rice paper or museum-grade cotton rag, hand-numbered and issued with a Certificate of Authenticity.